INTRODUCTION:
Reports on the treatment result of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) from a single primary cancer are rare and mixed treatment modalities make it even more difficult to interpret the results properly. Here, we report clinical outcomes of an intraventricular chemotherapy for LMC from non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS:
Medical records of 105 patients were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed to find the prognostic factors of patients’ survival and symptom responses, including intracranial pressure (ICP) control.

RESULTS:
There were 44 men and 61 women, with a median age of 56 years (range, 31-75 years). Patients received a median five rounds of intraventricular chemotherapy (range, 1-49 rounds). The most common presenting symptom was headache (77%) with nausea or vomiting, which showed the highest response rate of 42%. Altered mentality (36%), cranial neuropathy (15%), and cauda equina symptoms (12%) revealed 10% or less of symptom response. Only eight patients (7.6%) showed negative conversion of cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Median overall survival was 3.0 months (range, 0.5-21.5 months). Age (≥ 60 years), poor Karnofsky performance score (< 70), and uncontrolled ICP were found to be unfavorable prognostic factors for patient survival. A greater amount of intraventricular chemotherapy, which was evaluated as time-dependent covariate, and concurrent systemic chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION:
Intraventricular chemotherapy for patients with LMC from non-small-cell lung cancer could palliate associated symptoms and prolong patients’ survival. Careful selection of patients for intraventricular chemotherapy is recommended with aggressive ICP control and concurrent systemic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND:In single-group studies, chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) have been associated with marked clinical responses to crizotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ALK. Whether crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy with respect to efficacy is unknown.

METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, open-label trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 347 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive lung cancer who had received one prior platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment with crizotinib (250 mg) twice daily or intravenous chemotherapy with either pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were permitted to cross over to crizotinib as part of a separate study. The primary end point was progression-free survival.

RESULTS:The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months in the crizotinib group and 3.0 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.64; P<0.001). The response rates were 65% (95% CI, 58 to 72) with crizotinib, as compared with 20% (95% CI, 14 to 26) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An interim analysis of overall survival showed no significant improvement with crizotinib as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death in the crizotinib group, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.54; P=0.54). Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, alopecia, and dyspnea. Patients reported greater reductions in symptoms of lung cancer and greater improvement in global quality of life with crizotinib than with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00932893.).